FT Schools - SpaceX's ambitious record IPO
FT Schools - SpaceX's ambitious record IPO

SpaceX headquarters at Hawthorne, California
Introduction
SpaceX, founded by Elon Musk, is planning what could become the largest initial public offering (IPO) in history. The company aims to raise around $75 billion. This is significantly higher than the current record set by Saudi Aramco in 2019, which raised about $25.6 billion (and later increased to around $29.4 billion with extra shares).
The proposed move represents a major shift from being a privately held company to publicly held company, with the shares being traded on the NASDAQ, the world's first fully electronic stock exchange, founded in 1971 and based in New York City. The change would give an estimated valuation for SpaceX of between $1.75 trillion to $2 trillion and highlights the importance of financial markets in funding business growth.
However, the IPO raises concerns about overvaluation, investor risks, and corporate governance, particularly due to Elon Musk’s strong influence over pricing decisions. The case also shows potential stakeholder conflicts between founders, investors, and regulators, alongside the challenges of balancing rapid expansion with financial stability.
The article and exam questions can be found on the FT Schools website here.
IB Syllabus links
| Syllabus unit | Key ideas for discussion |
| 1.2 Types of business entities |
|
| 1.4 Stakeholders |
|
| 1.5 External growth |
|
| 3.2 Sources of finance |
|
| 3.8 Investment appraisal |
|
| BMT 3 - STEEPLE analysis |
|
| Key concepts |
|
Read the FT article here and then have a go at answering these questions from Quizlet:
Read the FT article here and then answer the two sets of questions:
Set 1
| (a) | State two features of an initial public offering (IPO). | [2 marks] |
| (b) | Explain one advantage and one disadvantage for SpaceX going public on the stock exchange. | [4 marks] |
| (c) | Using stakeholder theory, explain two possible conflicts arising from SpaceX’s IPO. | [4 marks] |
Answers
(a) State two features of an initial public offering (IPO). [2 marks]
Possible answers include:
- Shares are sold to the general public for the first time.
- The company becomes listed on a stock exchange, such as the NASDAQ.
- Co-ownership is transferred to the (new) shareholders.
- Accept any other relevant feature.
Mark as a 1 + 1.
(b) Explain one advantage and one disadvantage for SpaceX going public on the stock exchange. [4 marks]
Advantages include an explanation of any one of the following:
- Raises large amounts of permanent share capital ($75 billion) for SpaceX's expansion.
- Going public cam improves SpaceX's public profile as a listed company, giving it greater access to future finance.
- Accept any other relevant advantage explained in the context of the case study.
Disadvantages include an explanation of any one of the following:
- Loss of control for Musk as ownership is diluted.
- Increased pressure from shareholders for short-term returns.
- Accept any other relevant disadvantage explained in the context of the case study.
Mark as a 2 + 2.
Award [1] for each relevant advantage/disadvantage and [1] for explaining this in the context of SpaceX, up to the maximum of [4].
(c) Using stakeholder theory, explain two possible conflicts arising from SpaceX’s IPO. [4 marks]
Possible answers include an explanation of any two of the following:
- Musk vs investors - possible disagreements over the valuation of the company and its control.
- Investors vs regulators - potential concerns about transparency and risks (the decision to go public would increase SpaceX’s accountability and transparency.
- Shareholders vs senior management - pressure for profits from new shareholders vs long-term vision of SpaceX’s senior management (board of directors).
- Accept any other relevant explanation, written in the context of the case study.
Mark as a 2 + 2.
Award [1] for identifying a relevant reason and [1] for explaining this in the context of SpaceX, up to the maximum of [4].
Set 2
| (a) | Define the term equity finance. | [2 marks] |
| (b) | Explain two reasons why external sources of finance are important for companies like SpaceX. | [2 marks] |
| (c) | Explain one advantage and one limitation for SpaceX operating on a larger scale. | [4 marks] |
Answers
(a) Define the term equity finance. [2 marks]
Equity finance is raising capital by selling shares of a limited liability company to investors, giving them ownership rights.
Award [1] for a definition that shows limited knowledge of equity finance.
Award [2] for a definition that shows clear and accurate understanding of equity finance, similar to the example above.
(b) Explain two reasons why external sources of finance are important for companies like SpaceX. [4 marks]
Possible answers include an explanation of any two of the following:
- External finance allows SpaceX to raise large amounts of capital for expansion - For example, its planned IPO aims to raise $75 billion, which can be used to fund highly expensive projects such as rocket development and space exploration.
- It helps to spread financial risks - By selling shares to investors on the NASDAQ stock exchange, SpaceX spreads the risks of space exploration with shareholders rather than relying only on its own internal funds.
- It can improve business growth and competitiveness - Access to significant funding ($75 billion) allows SpaceX to invest in innovation and compete with other firms in the aerospace and technology industries.
- Accept any other relevant reason, explained in the context of the case study.
Mark as a 2 + 2.
Award [1] for each relevant reason and [1] for explaining this in the context of SpaceX, up to the maximum of [4].
(c) Explain one advantage and one limitation for SpaceX operating on a larger scale. [4 marks]
Possible advantages include an explanation of any one of the following:
- Economies of scale (larger scale production reduces average costs) - For SpaceX, producing more rockets can lower cost per launch through more efficient use of resources, such as the use of specialist scientists and researchers.
- Greater access to finance - Large firms like SpaceX can attract significant funds (such as the proposed $75 billion IPO), supporting further expansion and innovation.
- Increased market power (market leadership) - Operating at a larger scale allows SpaceX to dominate parts of the space industry, influence prices, and compete more effectively against rivals (such as Amazon's Blue Origin).
- Accept any other relevant advantage explained in the context of the case study.
Possible limitations include an explanation of any one of the following:
- Diseconomies of scale, where average costs may increase as the firm grows - For SpaceX, managing complex global operations and large projects can reduce its operational and cost efficiency.
- Greater stakeholder pressure - As a larger (and potentially publicly held) company, SpaceX faces more scrutiny from investors, regulators, and the public, limiting the managerial freedom that Elon Musk previously had.
- Coordination and communication challenges - With a larger workforce and more departments, decision-making at SpaceX can become slower and less effective.
- Accept any other relevant limitation explained in the context of the case study.
Mark as a 2 + 2.
Award [1] for each relevant advantage/limitation and [1] for explaining this in the context of SpaceX, up to the maximum of [4].
Paul Hoang, InThinking

Check out our other collaborative pieces with FT Schools by using the hyperlinks below:
- Tony's Chocolonely (Why investing in farmers is good for business)
- Barrafina (How high-end restaurants went global)
- Games Workshop (How Warhammer won)
- BP's divestment of Castrol (BP to sell its stake in Castrol to pay down debt)
- Carlsberg's product strategy (Core beer brands drop to less than half of sales for first time)
- Visa and Mastercard's market leadership (European alternatives to Visa and Mastercard)
- TDK, Apple's battery supplier, takes on smartglasses rivals (TDK and Ansoff's matrix)
All our collaborations with FT Schools include student-friendly versions of the FT articles (case studies), exam practice questions, and full mark schemes for teachers.
Paul Hoang
FT Schools teacher advisor for IB Business Management
