Paper 3 (HL)

Source: TradeKindness
"Success isn't about how much money you make, it's about the difference you make in people's lives."
- Michelle Obama (b.1964), American attorney and First Lady of the US (2009 to 2017)
The Paper 3 exam
Paper 3 (HL only) exam, with a duration of 1 hour and 15 minutes, is based on unseen stimulus material about a social enterprise. The purpose is to assess important business management knowledge and skills (such as strategic analysis and evaluation) within the context of a social enterprise as a business entity. Paper 3 is forward-looking, providing students the opportunity to develop and demonstrate their problem solving abilities and decision making skills.
The rationale for the specific focus on social enterprises is in line with the objectives of the new course (to enable students to develop as confident, creative and compassionate business leaders, entrepreneurs, social entrepreneurs and as change agents, page 17 of the guide). It also aligns well with the CAS programme as well as the IB mission statement.
In this paper, students will act as change agents using an ethical and creative lens to solve significant strategic challenges facing a social enterprise in a sustainable way.
The exam paper is strategic in scope so any of the BMT could be used to recommend an appropriate plan of action, e.g., SWOT analysis, STEEPLE analysis, Ansoff matrix, BCG matrix, and Porters’ generic strategies.
What is a social enterprise?
Social enterprises are an example of social purpose organizations (SPOs). Essentially, they aim to primarily provide a solution to important social or environmental issues. They exist to to create a better world due to the role they play to improve society overall. As they are not always revenue-generating, SPOs often need financial funding and suitable human resources. Other SPOs include charities, cooperatives, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
Definitions of social enterprises include the following:
- "a business entity that aims to achieve a social or environmental mission while also generating revenue. It combines the principles of traditional business with a focus on addressing social or environmental issues." (Social Enterprise UK)
- "businesses that put the interests of people and planet ahead of shareholder gain. These businesses are driven by a social/environmental mission and reinvest profits into creating positive social change." (Social Enterprise Mark)
- "combine societal goals with an entrepreneurial spirit (and) focus on achieving wider social, environmental, or community objectives." (European Commission)
- "a business with primarily social objectives whose surpluses are principally reinvested for that purpose in the business or in the community, rather than being driven by the need to maximise profit for shareholders and owners." (Gov.uk)
Whilst there are several competing definitions, unlike traditional for-profit businesses, social enterprises combine social and commercial agendas in order to achieve their social, developmental, and environmental agenda. Their activities, by definition, are driven by and create social benefits.
Types of social enterprise explicitly featured in the IB Business Management syllabus:
- For-profit social enterprises (AO3): (i) Private sector companies, (ii) Public sector companies, and (iii) Cooperatives.
- Non-profit social enterprises (AO3): (iv) Non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
Examples of social enterprises are shown here:

Click the eye icon for a brief summary of each of the above examples of social enterprises:
- The Eden Project - a visitor attraction in Cornwall, England, that is concerned with environmental sustainability.
- Central Park Zoo - NYC's Central Park Zoo seeks to inspire visitors to connect with nature and promote animal conservation.
- Tony's Chocolonely - the Dutch chocolate manufacturer exists to end all forms of exploitation (including child labour) in the cocoa industry, especially in Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire.
- The Big Issue - founded in the UK back in 1991, The Big Issue generates revenue through its magazine sales and advertising. This funds are used to tackle the issue of homelessness.
- Toms - the shoe maker that offers a "One for One'' deal - for every pair of shoes purchased, TOMS donates a pair to a child in need.
- Java Eco Project - a Singapore-based social enterprise that partners with Indonesian NGOs to upcycle products and eliminate non-recyclable materials to support the education of trash-picker children in Indonesia.
- iBakery - operated by the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals in Hong Kong, iBakery trains and hires people with disabilities giving them employment and career prospects and a sense of self-worth (dignity).
- National Trust - one of Europe's largest non-profit organizations focused on environmental conservation. Its membership fees are used to protect historic places of interest, green spaces, farmland, gardens, nature reserves, and coastlines.
Note that social enterprises can, and often are, for-profit organizations. However, the difference is their existence (or social purpose) is beyond profitability as its very existence generates social benefits. In other words, profit follows as a consequence of its social and environmental goals, rather than as a result of its commercial activities.
Also, it is important to understand that a social enterprise is not a charity. A charity, as a legal entity, is not a social enterprise as it does not generate any sales revenue from commercial activities.
Take the example of Change Please, founded in 2015. The company sells coffee but uses 100% of its profits to tackle to social and economic problems associated with homelessness.
A second example is The Big Issue, which helps the homeless and people in vulnerable housing to restart their lives. Established in 1991, The Big Issue is the UK's largest street newspaper and is now published in four continents.
"Your hard work is the dream of every unemployed person. Your restless child is the dream of everyone without children.
Your small home is the dream of every homeless person. Your little capital is the dream of every debtor. Your poor health is the dream of every patient with an incurable disease. Your peace, your peaceful sleep, your accessible food is the dream of everyone in a country at war. You must appreciate everything you have. After all, no one knows what tomorrow will bring."
- Jackie Chan, (b.1954), Hong Kong actor, director, and philanthropist
Some differences between social enterprise, traditional commercial (for-profit business entities), and charitable organizations are outlined in Table 1 below.
Table 1 - Differences between charities, social enterprises, and traditional (for-profit) businesses
Charities | Social enterprises | Traditional businesses |
Mission driven (charitable mission) | Purpose driven (social purpose) | Vision driven (commercial vision) |
Funded by donations, grants, and fundraising | Funded by internal and external sources, including sales revenue | Funded by owners, investors, and internal and external sources |
Surplus reinvested | Significant portion of profits reinvested* | Profits mainly distributed to owners (shareholders) |
Purely charitable | Focus on social benefits | Corporate social responsibility (CSR) |
Non-profit organizations | Can be for-profit, non-profit, or NGO | For-profit organizations |
Focus on societal gains (public benefits) | Focus on social and environment impact plus profit generation | Focus on financial returns (shareholder value) |
No individual ownership, but governed by a board | Can be owned by individuals, non-profits, or trusts | Owned by individuals, partnerships, or shareholders |
Tax exempt | May have tax benefits depending on legal structure | Taxable business entities, subject to corporate taxes |
* According to Social Enterprise UK, social enterprises reinvest or donate at least half of any profits they earn to further their social or environmental mission.
Social enterprises have three main sustainable business objectives, commonly referred to as ‘the triple bottom line’. The triple bottom line, a business management model developed by John Elkington (b.1949), comprises of the following:
- Economic sustainability (profit) - to earn a profit to fund its activities and growth in a sustainable way.
- Social or cultural sustainability (people) - to provide social gains for members of local communities, such as providing job opportunities and support for less-privileged members of society.
- Environmental sustainability (planet) - to manage and operate the business in such a way as to protect the ecological (natural) environment, i.e., behaving in an environmentally sustainable and responsible manner.
So, in addition to striving to earn a profit or financial surplus, social enterprises are driven foremost by social and/or environmental objectives and socially responsible practices. Some examples of these are outlined in Table 2 below.
Table 2 - Examples of social and environmental sustainable practices
Social (cultural) sustainability practices | Environmental (ecological) sustainability practices |
Social enterprises being led by women | Fair trade practices |
Diversity in management representation | Business practices that address climate change |
Paying employees fair and decent wages | Circular business models |
Operating in the most deprived communities | Transparency in approaches to environmental protection |
Driven by an authentic social mission | Driven by an authentic environmental mission |
Adding a third paper for HL means reducing the time needed for the other papers, previously 2 hours 15 minutes each.
The stimulus material in Paper 3 will typically consist of:
- a short introduction to the social enterprise.
- a visual representation of a product.
- about 5 or 6 excerpts from various documents (such as emails, social media feeds, infographics, and newspaper articles).
Students need to answer the one compulsory structured set of questions based on the unseen stimulus material. This paper is worth 25 mark in in total.
Note that a calculator is permitted for this examination paper. This is because there may be quantitative data included in stimulus material, such as in the May 2024 Paper 3 examination (gearing ratio and debtor days ratio for MF Future Housing). All calculations in Business Management exams can be completed using a 4-function calculator.
Candidates are provided with 2 four-page booklets to write their answers for this examination.
The Paper 3 examination requires students to do three main things:
- Identify and describe a human need (worth 2 marks)
- Explain the potential organizational challenges facing the social entrepreneur wanting to meet this need (worth 6 marks), and
- Write a decision-making document that consists of a business recommendation or strategic "plan of action" (worth 17 marks).
An example is shown below:
1. | Using an appropriate business management theory, describe a human need that SML meets by donating free healthy lunches to school children. | [2 marks] |
2. | Explain two possible challenges facing SML. | [6 marks] |
3. | Using all the resources provided and your knowledge of business management, recommend a possible plan of action to ensure the sustainability of SML for the next five years. | [17 marks] |
Click on the icon below to see alternative style of questions that may appear in the Paper 3 examination:
Example 2
1. | Using an appropriate business management theory, describe one human need that MFFH satisfies for young families requiring affordable homes. | [2 marks] |
2. | Explain one marketing challenge and one financial challenge facing MFFH if it accepts the United Nations (UN) order. | [6 marks] |
3. | Using all the resources provided and your knowledge of business management tools and theories, recommend a possible plan of action for MFFH over the next five years. | [17 marks] |
Example 3
1. | Using an appropriate business management motivation theory, describe one human need that SP meets by offering fresh fruit to children and free life coaching (mentoring). | [2 marks] |
2. | Using Resource 3 and other relevant information from the stimulus, explain two possible financial challenges facing SP. | [6 marks] |
3. | Using all the resources provided and your knowledge of business management, recommend a possible plan of action to ensure to ensure "A New Way 2029" succeeds. | [17 marks] |
ATL Activity - Give it a go!
Working on your own, or as a pair with another student, investigate a social enterprise of your own choice. In particular, your research should enable you to answer the following questions:
- What is the human need that your chosen social enterprise is striving to meet? How does this link to the IB Business Management syllabus?
- What are the two main challenges facing your chosen social enterprise? In particular, how do these two challenges limit the social enterprise's ability to meet the identified human need in Question 1 above?
- What is your proposed plan of action to address these two main challenges? What else would the social enterprise need to do to ensure it is sustainable, competitive, and successful in the next 5 years? Provide full justifications for your plan of action.
Be prepared to present your findings to your teacher and the rest of the class. You may choose to use visuals in your presentation. An example is shown below for reference.

- Note that all five units of the syllabus can be assessed (Units 1 - 5), including HL extension topics.
- This also applies to the Business Management Toolkit (BMT).
- The overall weighting of Paper 3 (HL only) is 25%.
- Paper 3 (HL only) answers are to be written on separate answer sheets (as with Paper 1, but unlike Paper 2).
- The grade boundaries, based on the May 2024 Paper 3 examination, are shown below. The maximum total number of marks for the paper is 25.
Grade | Mark range | Percentage |
7 | 18 - 25 | 72% |
6 | 15 - 17 | 60% |
5 | 13 - 14 | 52% |
4 | 10 - 12 | 40% |
3 | 7 - 9 | 28% |
2 | 4 - 6 | 16% |
1 | 0 - 3 |
Question 1 - Human needs (2 marks)
For Question 1 of Paper 3, students need to be able to identify and describe an example of a human need. This can include consideration of:
- Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
- McClelland’s theory of needs
- UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals and human needs (all social enterprises address one of the SDGs)
- Ecological, Economic, and Social (Cultural) sustainability needs, i.e., John Elkington's triple bottom line
- Stakeholder needs
Top tip 1!
It is advisable to avoid using Herzberg's two factor theory (hygiene and motivators) in Question 1 of this paper. This is because Herzberg's theory relates to employees, i.e., internal stakeholders of the social enterprise. Question 1 is about the social need or human need (in general) that the social enterprise tries to address, rather than the specific interests of its own employees.
Question 2 - Organizational challenges (6 marks)
For Question 2 of Paper 3, students must also be able to explain the potential organizational challenges or threats facing the social entrepreneur wanting to meet the human need that is identified and described in Question 1. Examples of organizational challenges include:
- SWOT analysis (BMT)
- STEEPLE analysis (BMT), e.g., competition
- Hofstede's cultural dimensions (BMT)
- Human resources challenges
- Sustainability challenges
- Financial resources, e.g., liquidity and budgeting
- Marketing challenges
- Operations management challenges
- Leadership and management challenges
- Change and resistance to change
Exam Context
It is possible for the IB to ask candidates to explain specific challenges faced by an organization. For example, in the May 2024 examination, candidates were required to explain one marketing challenge and one finance challenge faced by MFFH - see Question 2 of the exam paper.
In the November 2024 examination, candidates were asked to explain two financial challenges facing Springfield Panthers (SP) - see Question 2 of the exam paper.
Top tip 2!
When structuring your answers to this question in Paper 3, use the following format for each of the two challenges (you do not need to exceed two paragraphs for this).
- Identify the specific challenge facing the organization.
- Explain how this is a challenge.
- Apply the stimulus material to support your explanation.
Paragraph 1
- Identify
- Explain
- Apply
Paragraph 2
- Identify
- Explain
- Apply
Question 3 - The plan of action (17 marks)
“If you don’t drive your business you will be driven out of business.”
- B.C. Forbes (1880-1954), Founder of Forbes Magazine
For Question 3, the final section of Paper 3, students are required to write a decision-making document that includes business recommendations or a plan of action. This extended response question is worth 17 marks (that's not a typo!)
Question 3 is a synoptic assessment, evaluating a candidate's ability to understand and integrate the connections between various elements of Business Management. It is designed to encourage a comprehensive and holistic understanding of a social enterprise, including its challenges and opportunities. Read more about this by clicking on the eye icon below.
Adapted from What is synoptic assessment? Filio Constantinou, Assessment in education, principles policy and practice Vol 27 2020.
Paper 3 is a synoptic assessment task and asks the candidate:
- to draw different business management ideas together and synthesize information.
- to make a clear and coherent argument and justification for an organization (social enterprise) to pursue a sustainable plan over a period of five years.
- to apply appropriate tools and theories to support arguments.
- to structure the response clearly, with ideas and analysis sequenced in a coherent manner to effectively utilize all the resource materials included.
Source: May 2024 Paper 3 (HL only) mark scheme, page 5
There are four assessment criteria for the extended response question in Question 3:
- Criterion A - Use of resource materials (worth 4 marks)
- Criterion B - Business management tools and theories (worth 4 marks)
- Criterion C - Evaluation (worth 6 marks)
- Criterion D - Sequencing of ideas and plan of action (worth 3 marks).
Top tip 3!

A useful way to remember the above assessment criteria for Question 3 is the acronym ATES:
- Application (Criterion A - Use of resource materials)
- Tools and theories (Criterion B - Business management tools and theories)
- Evaluation (Criterion C - Evaluation)
- Sequencing (Criterion D - Sequencing of ideas and plan of action).
Top tip 4!
For the extended response question in Paper 3, you are expected to demonstrate your (i) knowledge, (ii) understanding, (iii) the capacity to explain, (iv) summarise, and (v) evaluate all of the evidence provided in the stimulus material in order to provide a recommendation (business strategy or plan of action) for the social enterprise.
Note that recommending a plan or action (or business strategy) requires you to write a synoptic response. What this means is that you must write a comprehensive and integrated answer that draws upon multiple areas of knowledge (relevant tools and theories) and stakeholder perspectives to address the question. Rather than focusing solely on one aspect (such as marketing), a synoptic response demonstrates your ability to synthesize information from the given sources to offer a well-rounded analysis and solution to the problem (the challenges faced by the social enterprise).
Essentially, the plan of action requires critical thinking, analytical skills, and the ability to connect and apply content across different contexts. In essence, your synoptic response to the 17-mark question must demonstrate a deep understanding of the subject by exploring its broader connections and implications.
Top tip 5!

In Question 3 of Paper 3, students may be required to recommend a plan of action to ensure the sustainability of the given social enterprise (as in the case of the specimen paper). Please note that the word "sustainability" in this context does not refer to the key concept but to the viable, feasible, unceasing or continual operations of the business.
In some cases, it may be appropriate to refer to people, planet, and profits (the triple bottom line model of sustainability) as part of the plan of action. However, this is not a formal requirement or expectation.
Top tip 6!
When structuring your answers to Question 3 in Paper 3, make sure your answer to the 17-mark essay contains the following:
- Introduction - include any key terms that may need to be defined.
- Body - three or four main paragraphs that address the demands of the question.*
- Conclusion - answer the question in its entirety.
- Fit for purpose paragraph - use the PEEL framework. Each paragraph is about one point, contains evidence (from the stimulus material) and explanations (using appropriate terminology, tools, and/or theories), and is directly linked to the question).

* The body of the extended response should have elements of an action plan that address each of the two challenges you explained in Question 2 of Paper 3.
Top tip 7!
The IB asks students to avoid using numbered lists or bullet points in AO2 and AO3 (extended response) questions. Instead, students should answer both the 6-mark and 17-mark questions with proper (full) sentences and paragraphs.
They should answer the questions as though they are management consultants or business analysts.
Source: adapted from Teacher Support Material (TSM), page 66)
Top tip 8!
“No matter how sharp your teeth are, you can't bite water.” - African Proverb
Meaning: Each problem comes with its own solution. Take time to understand the nature of the situation before taking action.
What exactly is a plan of action?
Note that a plan of action is not a single strategy used in isolation. An action plan (or strategic plan) will have numerous elements to it, i.e., it is essentially a business plan. Therefore, a well-designed plan of action may include relevant aspects of the following (depending on the specific case study in question):
Element of action plan | Description | Examples of content (tools & theories) |
Human resource action plan | A well-designed human resource plan of action is crucial for the success of any organization as it helps to attract and retain the best employees, enhance their performance, and ultimately contribute to the achievement of the social enterprise's corporate objectives. |
|
Marketing action plan | A well-designed marketing action plan is critical for the success of any business, as it helps the organization to reach and engage with customers, differentiate their products from those offered by competitors, and ultimately drive sales revenue and growth. |
|
Operations management action plan | A well-designed operations management action plan is vital for the functioning and performance of a business as it helps to ensure that goods and/or services are produced efficiently and with consistent quality, while minimizing waste and reducing production costs. |
|
Financial action plan | A well-designed finance action plan is important for the success of any business as no strategy can be executed without the necessary funds. The plan helps to ensure that the business considers the necessary financial resources to operate, grow, and make strategic decisions, while managing financial risks and providing stakeholders with transparent and accurate financial information. |
|
Therefore, it is worthwhile revising BMT 5 - Business Plans prior to tackling any Paper 3 practice questions.
Also, note that any plan of action must align with the social enterprise's mission or vision - so look out for indications of these in the stimulus material.
Note: it is possible to discuss the plan of action in terms of short-term and long-term plans, depending on the demands of the question. So, for example, if the question is about recommending a plan of action to ensure the sustainability of the social enterprise for the next 5 years, students can discuss the recommended strategy in the first one or two years, and the longer-term strategies for the final 3 to 5 years.
Your plan of action should not only address the current issues faced by the social enterprise (the two challenges identified in Question 2), but must provide solutions for the future in terms of the organization's sustainability, profitability (financial health), and competitiveness.
A strategy that works for some students is to present their recommendations for priority action within the first two years, i.e., how to tackle the two challenge faced by the social enterprise explained in Question 2. Thereafter, they present the longer-term plan of action (Years 3 to 5), which will have an a positive long-term impact on the social enterprise.
Top tip 9!
Students often ask how many functional areas need to be covered in the plan of action. Given that Question 2 in Paper 3 is about two challenges that the social enterprise faces, the plan of action should address these these challenges using the most relevant tools and theories as appropriate.
For example, both human resources and/or marketing strategies can be used to address the first challenge, whereas finance and/or operations management strategies could be more appropriate for the second challenge.
The important point is to focus on addressing the two challenges in this question.
Top tip 10!
Do not make any reference to real-world examples of social enterprises that you have studied. There are two main reasons for this:
- The examiner may not be aware of the organization.
- Such an approach shows a lack of application of the stimulus material.
Instead, focus your extended response (essay) on the actual social enterprise in the Paper 3 case study.
Top tip 11!

Although it is not a formal requirement to include a key concept in the Paper 3 extended response question, it may be useful to consider the concept of sustainability, change, or ethics when evaluating the plan of action.
To score top marks in Criterion C (evaluation), students must acknowledge limitations of the recommended plan of action, including possible trade-offs, i.e., compromises, sacrifices, or opportunity costs of a strategic decision. For example, a student might consider the extent to which their plan of action is sustainable and/or ethical or how well it adapts to changes in the internal and external environments.
Note: acknowledging limitations of the plan of action is not the same as acknowledging limitations of the case study or stimulus materials (as is expected in the 10-mark extended response questions in both Paper 1 and Paper 2).
Paper 3 extended response question (17-mark essay) - Understanding the assessment criteria
Criterion A – Use of resource materials (Application)
This assessment criterion assesses the extent to which the candidate uses the stimulus materials to effectively support the recommended plan of action. It is worth up to 4 marks.
Marks | Level descriptor |
0 | The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. |
1 | The response makes limited reference to the resource materials provided or the resources identified have been used ineffectively to support the recommended plan of action. |
2 | The response makes some reference to the resource materials provided or the resources identified have been used in a superficial way to support the recommended plan of action. |
3 | The response makes reference to most of the resource materials provided to support the recommended plan of action. |
4 | The response makes reference to all resource materials provided to effectively support the recommended plan of action. |
So, to score top marks, the student must show evidence of the following throughout their written response:
- reference to all stimulus materials provided in the exam, namely all 5 or 6 excerpts from various documents (such as emails, special media feeds, and newspaper articles).
- use of the stimulus materials from the excerpts in an effective way to support the recommendations (plan of action), i.e., application of how the evidence provided will strengthen the recommended business strategy.
Top tip 12!
Given that assessment criterion A (Use of resource materials) requires candidates to make reference to "all resource materials provided", it is worth citing this in your extended response answers, e.g., "As resource 1 shows..." or use brackets (parentheses) to show where you have applied the stimulus materials, e.g., "(Resource 4)".
Criterion B – Business Management tools and theories (Tools and theories)
This assessment criterion assesses the extent to which a candidate’s plan of action (recommendations) effectively apply appropriate business management tools and theories. It is also worth up to 4 marks.
Marks | Level descriptor |
0 | The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. |
1 | The response demonstrates limited application of appropriate business management tools and theories. |
2 | The response superficially applies appropriate business management tools and theories. |
3 | The response satisfactorily applies appropriate business management tools and theories. |
4 | The response effectively applies appropriate business management tools and theories. |
As this is an academic piece of work, the response must demonstrate clear, appropriate, and effective use of relevant business management tools and theories, throughout the extended response question.
Remember that any of the 15 tools from the Business Management Toolkit (BMT) can be used, where appropriate, for this purpose. However, any relevant tools or theories beyond the BMT (but within the syllabus) can be used. This is reinforced in the N24 Paper 3 mark scheme:
“Appropriate tools can be identified from the toolkit but any theory (business content) which is used as a decision-making tool or applied to the plan of action should be accepted.” (page 6)
Criterion C – Evaluation (Evaluation)
This assessment criterion assesses the extent to which the candidate effectively evaluates the expected impact of their plan of action on the relevant areas of the social enterprise*. It is worth up to 6 marks (about 35% of the marks for the extended response question in Paper 3).
Marks | Level descriptor |
0 | The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. |
1 - 2 | The response is largely descriptive with limited analysis or evaluation of the expected impact of their plan of action. There is limited reference to the relevant areas of the business. |
3 - 4 | The response analyses the expected impact of their plan of action with some reference to the relevant areas of the business. There is some evidence of evaluation but it is not sustained. |
5 - 6 | The student effectively evaluates the expected impact of their plan of action on the relevant areas of the business and considers the trade-offs between those areas. |
* Note that relevant areas do not imply that all parts of an organization (human resources, finance, marketing, and operations management) need to be considered in the plan of action. As stated in the M24 P3 mark scheme, “relevant areas could be a consideration of two areas” (page 8).
To score top marks, students must demonstrate evidence of evaluation in terms of:
- the realistically expected impacts of their recommendations (plan of action).
- reference to the relevant areas of the business that are likely to be impacted, such as human resource, finance and accounts, operations management, and/or marketing functions of the social enterprise.
- the short-term versus long-term implications of the plan of action.
- the probable opportunity costs (sacrifices or trade-offs) due to the recommendations (plan of action) - see Top tip 8 above and Top tip 13 below.
Top tip 13!
“However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.”
- Sir Winston Churchill, British Prime Minister (1940 - 45 and 1951 - 55)
So, what happens if a student does not address the two challenges (in Question 2) in their plan of action in the extended response question?
The 17-mark question is sufficiently broad to allow for a range of responses within a strategic focus. This means there is no definitive or prescribed plan of action.
However, it can be self-penalising is students ignore the two challenges in the previous question given that the extended response question is strategic and forward-looking in nature. Logically, Question 2 in Paper 3 asks students to explain two organizational challenges - there is no need to ask this question if the challenges can then be ignored in the plan of action.
As stated in the Teacher Support Material (TSM) on My IB, students should be "analysing issues facing the organization and the possible ways forward." (page 67). These issues clearly refer to the challenges identified earlier by the candidate. However, it also requires students to consider plans for the future (or long-term) in dealing with these challenges as well as other considerations as part of a holistic and strategic plan of action.
Top tip 14!
As a general rule, remember that all business decisions (the recommendations in the plan of action) will have at least two wider implications or trade-offs on an organization:
- The impact on human resources - Students should consider how their recommendations (in the plan of action) are likely to affect employees, perhaps in terms of training needs or their level of motivation and productivity.
- The impact on finances - Every business decision / plan of action / strategy will have a direct impact on the organization's finances. Students should consider how their recommendations (in the plan of action) will affect the organization's finances. For example, are the recommendations viable (realistic) given the firm's budgets and current financial position?
Recall that to score top marks in Criterion C (evaluation), students must acknowledge the possible trade-offs of their plan of action, i.e., the compromises, sacrifices, or opportunity costs. Other more generic examples of trade-offs include:
- Internal growth strategie vs. External growth strategies – Expanding organically ensures control and stability, but it is slower compared to inorganic methods such as the acquisition of other businesses. However, external growth methods carry more risk and are more costly.
- Financial rewards vs. Cost control – Offering better pay and employment conditions (such a higher salaries and improved staff benefits) can improve employee retention and productivity but this comes at the opportunity cost of higher operational costs.
- Debt financing vs. Equity financing – Taking on debt (such as using loans from commercial lenders) allows a company to retain full ownership with diluting control, but this increases financial risks (such as the comany's gearing ratio). By contrast, issuing shares reduces such financial risk but will dilute ownership and control of the company.
- Short-term pains vs. Long-term gains – A business that focuses on immediate profits (such as cost-cutting measures) can gain in the short-term but such actions may hinder its long-term investment and sustainability efforts. Consider the long-term impacts on student outcomes if a school chooses not to invest in staff training by not sending teachers on IB training courses(!)
- Market expansion vs. Brand dilution – Expanding into new markets may increase an organization's sales revenue and revenue streams, but could dilute brand identity and alienate existing and loyal customers.
- Price vs. Quality – Lowering prices can attract more customers and encourage brand switching, but this can be at the opportunity cost of lower profit margins and reliance on sales volume to maintain profits. By contrast, focusing on premium-priced products can raise product margins but limit the market size.
- Market share vs. Market penetration – Lowering prices can help a business to gain market share but the sacrifice is reduced profit margins. By contrast, maintaining higher prices helps to improve profit margins but may limit market penetration.
- Specialization vs. Diversification – Specializing in one particular product or market can create expertise but makes the business vulnerable to market fluctuations and changes in the external environment. In contrast, diversification spreads risks but also dilute strategic focus so can lead to diseconomies of scale.
- First-mover advantage vs. Market uncertainties – Entering a market first can build brand recognition and establish a loyal customer base, but involves higher risks. Entering the market at a later stage brings advantages the firm can learn from competitors already in the market, but may mean missing out on early opportunities (first-mover advantages).
- Cost vs. Quality – A business may choose to reduce costs by using cheaper materials or outsourcing, but this may come compromise product quality and therefore harm the its corporate or brand reputation.
- Automation vs. Employment – Automating production methods can improve operational efficiency and lower costs per unit for a business, but this may be at the opportunity cost of staff layoffs (redundancies) and lower employee morale.
- Customization vs. Standardization – Offering customized products (using job production methods) can attract niche markets and increase profit margins, but this can also increases production complexity and costs compared to standardized output using mass production methods.
- Outsourcing vs. In-house production (or Cost to buy vs. Cost to make) – Outsourcing can reduce per unit costs of production and improve efficiency, but it may lead to quality control issues and over-reliance on external suppliers.
- Innovation vs. Risk – Investing in research and development (R&D) can lead to new market opportunities, but it can also carry huge higher financial risks for the sustainability of the business if the product fails.
Note: If a candidate suggests that additional information is needed or questions the reliability of the stimulus material before developing an effective action plan, examiners do not view this as a trade-off.
Criterion D – Sequencing of ideas and plan of action (Structure)
This final assessment criterion for Question 3 assesses the extent to which the candidate’s ideas and plan of action are sequenced in a clear and coherent manner. This assessment criterion is worth up to 3 marks.
Marks | Level descriptor |
0 | The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below. |
1 | The response is limited in its sequencing of ideas and plan of action. |
2 | The response consists of ideas and a plan of action but these are not always sequenced in a clear manner. |
3 | The response effectively sequences appropriate ideas and a plan of action in a clear and coherent manner. |
Therefore, to score top marks, candidates must:
- Use fit for purpose paragraphs (use the PEEL framework for this - see Top tip 5 above).
- Have an introduction, body (analysis and evaluation), and conclusion.
- Ensure the ideas and the plan of action in the essay flow in a clear, logical, and well-organized way.
- The conclusion must answer the question in its entirety.
Top tip 15!
Click on the links to these two documents that provide additional advice and top tips about how to write high-scoring answers for the 17-mark extended response question.
I am extremely grateful to the teachers who have worked so hard to create and share these resources with the InThinking Business Management community.
Paper 3 assessment overview poster
This high-resolution poster has been created and shared by Tarren Mulligan from Ruamrudee International School in Bangkok, Thailand. Many thanks Tarren!
Paper 3 (HL only) Exam Question Papers and Mark Schemes
Case study 1 - Change Please
Teachers can access a full Paper 3 exam practice paper, plus full mark scheme, based on my personal favourite social enterprise, Change Please, by clicking the link here.

Case study 2 - Power of Active Love
Teachers can also access a second full Paper 3 exam practice paper, plus full mark scheme, based on the social enterprise Power of Active Love (PAL) by clicking the link here.

Case study 3 - Lisa Accessories
A third Paper 3 exam practice paper plus full mark scheme, based on Lisa Accessories, a hypothetical organization - as will be the case with the actual Paper 1 external exams - can be accessed by clicking the link here.

Case study 4 - iBakery

This fourth Paper 3 exam practice paper plus full mark scheme is based on my favourite social enterprise in Hong Kong. iBakery strives to give people with disabilities a sense of dignity, self-worth, and employment opportunities. This Paper 3 resource can be accessed by clicking the link here.
Case study 5 - Tony's Chocolonely

The fifth Paper 3 exam paper focuses on Tony's Chocolonely, the Dutch multinational company that strives to eradicate slave labour and the exploitation of child labour in the cocoa industry. This Paper 3 resource can be accessed by clicking the link here.
Case Study 6 - Karya

The sixth Paper 3 exam paper focuses on a real for-profit social enterprise called Karya, based in 24 of the 28 states in India. The resource has been produced in collaboration with Samik Das, Housemaster at The Doon School, Dehradun, India. Samik is also a senior IB examiner. Many thanks for all your efforts with this, Samik! This latest Paper 3 resource can be accessed by clicking the link here.
Case Study 7 - Libros De Libertad

Our latest Paper 3 exam paper has been created in collaboration with Sylvaine Plan, who teaches at Premier International IB Continuum school in Lalitpur, Nepal. This case study is about Libros De Libertad (LDL), a social enterprise that dedicates its profits to fund literacy programmes for underprivileged children, as well as training and educational initiatives for teachers. You can access the resources here.
Return to the the external assessments homepage
