New syllabus - Questions & Answers

New syllabus - Questions & Answers from IB upskilling workshops

Please take look at this list of questions discussed at the IB Category 3 Subject Specific Seminar and IB Category 2 Workshop attended by some fantastic teachers from across all three IB regions on 4th - 6th March and 26th - 28th May 2022 respectively. These 25 questions (and there were many more) came from the participants during our Q&A sessions.

See how many of the questions below you can answer correctly as we all prepare for the changes being implemented from July/August 2022 and for first examinations in 2024.

To read more about the new syllabus on InThinking Business Management, please click the hyperlink here.


Question

Answer

1.

Is the Business Management Toolkit (BMT) taught on its own as opposed to being embedded in the existing units?

You can take either of these approaches (although the BMT still needs to applied throughout teaching of the course).

For more suggestions about this, click the link here.

2.

How should the new key concepts be integrated into the regular content coverage of the new guide? Can it be done in the same way as CUEGIS is being done?

Yes, that approach can indeed work (replace CUEGIS with "CESC" concepts).

3.

Can students use more than one key concept in IA as they are interrelated anyway?

No - they will lose marks for doing so (see assessment criterion A on page 56 of guide).

4.

Since there are 4 formats of financial statements (profit and non-profit entities), are these formats included in the formulae sheet as students now have to remember 4 different formats?

Unfortunately, these are not included in the formulae sheet for students.

5.

When will the IB send/upload the Paper 1 pre-release statement?

Three months in advance of the exam.

6.

Can the same assessments (and resources) that we have been using for the current syllabus be continued except for the new contents that have been added?

To some (minimal) extent. Teachers will need to refer to the revised learning outcomes for each section (AO1 - AO4) as well as the new external assessment models.

7.Can SL students use HL tools for the IA?

No - this approach is not recommended at all.

8.Will we have to create new unit plans, or can we alter or tweak some sections and keep the rest as it is?

It might be more efficient to "start all over" but you can still use existing resources for the likes of Herzberg, Maslow, and Taylor, for example. But: concepts have been changed, the BMT is new, the assessments have all changed; so these need to be embedded in the (new) unit plans.

9.Is there a limit or minimum number of tools that students can/should use in the IA?

No (this only applies to the number of supporting documents); it is important to remember to use the right tools for the right job.

10.Is it advisable to request the Mathematics teachers of the school help to teach the new statistical sections (descriptive stats, linear regression, and correlation)? How do we teach the business context?

This could certainly work, especially in the initial years as we all transition to the new course. There will be plenty of resources available to support teachers and students too (from the likes of IBID Press, Hodder Education, Level7 Education, InThinking etc.)

11.What are the expectations of the pre-released statement in terms of exam preparation?

Please refer to guide, pages 41 for guidance about Paper 1 (such as the 5 hour preparation time).

12.Since tools are not part of specific chapters or units of the new course, can we teach only the tools which students in our schools would be likely to use for their IAs and EE and not all of them?

No, as any of the BMT can appear in any of the 3 exam papers.

13.Do students need a graphing calculator (GDC) for their tests/exams?

This is not compulsory, although GDCs are allowed in the exams. However, BM students can (continue to) use a simple 4-function calculator.

14.Can a new HL student do an IA like the former IAs, but with a new conceptual lens?

No, as the nature of the task is completely different, e.g., no research proposal, no executive summary, no recommendations are needed for the new IA.

15.Do businesses now picked for the IAs have to be known (as was in BM SL IAs earlier) or can they be smaller businesses that students used for HL IAs previously?

Large or small (unknown) organizations are fine for the new IA - but they must be authentic (evidence is critical).

16.Can students have more than 5 sources (supporting documents) put into a separate "other sources" section? Or is this a hard limit to a maximum 5 source documents?

It is a maximum limit of 5 supporting documents. Students can use additional sources (such as textbooks) but these are not supporting documents.

17.The word count limit now for IAs changes from 1,500 to 1,800 words, so are the extra 300 words available now mainly for explaining the key concept being used in the IA?

No - the additional words are not exclusive to the concept, but also accommodate for (i) subheadings, which are included in the word count, and (ii) they allow for a little more flexibility in terms of depth of analysis to reach the higher mark bands.

18.Should there be a balance between primary and secondary research between the 3 to 5 supporting documents?

This will depend on the research question - the IA can use only primary research, only secondary resource or any combination of the two methods.

19.Does the common IA still hold the 3-year rule for the supporting documents?

Yes.  The supporting documents must be contemporary in nature, i.e., published within a maximum of 3years prior to  submission to the IB.

20.For the IA, do students need to have a methodology section as the IA criteria does not mention if it is required or suggested?

There is no formal requirement, but if using primary research this would make sense (to include a methodology of the field research, such as the rationale for the sampling method used).

21.There is no clear guidance about the depth of teaching the components of the Business Management Toolkit. To what depth should we deliver the fifteen tools?

The guide states the eight tools that need to be taught to SL and HL students, plus an additional 7 tools for HL only students. As stated in the guide, all of these tools must be taught (at AO2 and AO4 level) alongside the syllabus content. For example, students need to be able to define all five specified circular business models, as well as be able to calculate the mean average (descriptive statistics) and plot scatter points on a diagram to determine the line of best fit (simple linear regression).

22.Is the way that the new guide will be taught in the DP the same for CP? Are students expected to submit an IA in the same way as a DP student?

A great question. For those who offer the CP (career-related programme), students in your class may be registered for the CP or DP at either SL or HL level. It makes no difference to your actual teaching. CP and DP candidates must complete the BM course in the same way, learning the same content specified in the guide and completing the internal assessment.

23.There seems to be lots of new terminology in the place of previous terms. Can students use both or should we be using only new syllabus terms in case examiners are not familiar with terms in the old guide?
Whilst some of these key terms (such as publicly held company or profit margin) might be new to us as teachers, remember that our new DP students will not have heard of the previous terms (such as private limited liability company or net profit margin). So, it is actually us as educators who need to do some unlearning and relearning to ensure our students use only the terminology in the (new) guide.
24.Is there some sort of Scheme of Work (or unit plans) that we can use to inspire our own SOWs?

Currently, there are no comprehensive SOW available (although I am open to be proved wrong on this!) As and when these might become available, I will notify InThinking subscribers and teachers via our Facebook group. For now, some things to consider as you create your curriculum maps include the need to include (not a definitive list):

  • The Business Management Toolkit (BMT)

  • The internal assessment (IA)

  • Approaches to teaching (ATT) and learning (ATL)

  • The key concepts (Creativity, Ethics, Sustainability, and Change)

  • The IB Learner Profile

  • Embedding TOK

  • CAS links

  • Assessments, e.g., in-class, formative, summative, end-of-year, and mock examinations

  • Possible educational field trips

  • Public holidays and other anticipated disruptions to teaching and learning

  • Teaching and learning resources.

However, to help you get started with this process, I have added some sample course outlines here.

25.Where can we find relevant sources to educate ourselves (as teachers first) for the content of the BMT and the Guide as well? Can we have these prior to start the new academic year?

There are three publications already available as physical textbooks and e-books, from Hodder Education, OUP (3rd edn) and IBID Press (5th edn). For a list of resources for the (new) Business Management course, please click the link here.

 Teacher only box

Teachers can download a copy of the PDF version of this quiz to use with students in class.

To see a copy of the PowerPoint presentation used for the InThinking upskilling courses for the new Business Management guide, click the link here.

Watch this short video that provides a brief overview of the new syllabus guide:

All materials on this website are for the exclusive use of teachers and students at subscribing schools for the period of their subscription. Any unauthorised copying or posting of materials on other websites is an infringement of our copyright and could result in your account being blocked and legal action being taken against you.