Home of real teaching & learning
  • Full support for teachers
  • Focus on critical thinking
  • Engaging classroom activities
  • Integrated student eBook
  • Assessed tasks / qBank
  • Practice exam questions

The InThinking Guarantee: Our sites are written by expert practitioners and not by AI

See our AI policy

Disclaimer: InThinking subject sites are neither endorsed by nor connected with the International Baccalaureate Organisation.

Don't miss out, find out!

Paper 2B: Good, bad, ugly

When evaluating a study on Paper 2, Section B, it is tempting to want to note all the faults of the study. However, in doing so, we may miss how the researchers actually attempted to address many methodological issues. In addition, you may assume that certain things are true that may not be - for example, that they did not get consent. When writing this response, I encourage you to write about the good, the bad, and...

Help