Refugees - Brian Bilston
Immigration has been a divisive topic in several elections around the world of late. The topic is often used to stir up hate and make scapegoats of people who have fled war, persecution, famine, or extreme poverty in their home countries. As Warsan Shire puts it in her poem Home (check out our lesson featuring this poem), “No one leaves home unless home is the mouth of a shark”. When countries open their borders to welcome refugees whose homes are no longer safe, isn’t this the very definition of Sharing the Planet?
The text that forms the basis of this page is a poem by British poet Brian Bilston, once described as “Twitter’s Banksy of poetry” due to his enigmatic nature. It’s simply called Refugees and serves as an excellent example of reverso poetry—a form in which the poem takes on a different meaning when read forwards and backwards, achieved through careful wordplay and the use of pivot phrases.
You might want to read the original here first to avoid spoiling the surprise!
At first glance, you might mistake Mr. Bilston for a far-right xenophobe with no sympathy for those seeking refuge. However, the message changes dramatically when read in reverse, the tone shifting from hostile to welcoming.
To emphasise the effect of this technique, the text and accompanying tasks below are split into two handouts.
How to use the text
Begin by presenting images that illustrate the conditions refugees endure. This source, though from 2015, provides a clear portrayal of their plight. Then show photos of anti-immigration protests, such as those that turned to riots in the UK in the summer of 2024.
Ask students to brainstorm adjectives to describe:
- The conditions the refugees are in
- How they must be feeling in the circumstances
Next, get them to think of adjectives to describe:
- The scenes from the riots
- The feelings of the rioters
Tell students they are going to read a poem about refugees, but don’t reveal the poem’s true meaning.
Give them the handout Refugees 1 and have them read the poem. Get them to write a 7-word summary of the attitude towards refugees expressed in the poem.
Next, move on to the vocabulary task. This will help students to gain a more nuanced understanding of the animosity shown towards refugees.
Task 1 Answers
Find a word or phrase in the text that… | Answer |
| Should |
| haggard |
| Layabouts and loungers |
| Chancers |
| scroungers |
| With bombs up their sleeves |
| Cut-throats and thieves |
Once these tricky vocabulary terms are understood, move on to task 2 – sectioning. This helps students break down the different parts of the poem and practise a skill that is tested on the Paper 2 reading exam with questions that require headings to be matched to sections. This could be done individually, but I like to encourage discussion for tasks like this as I get to hear students’ logic and correct any misunderstandings.
Task 2 Answers
Section | Line Numbers |
Denying Empathy and Shared Humanity | 1-4 They have no need of our help So do not tell me These haggard faces could belong to you or me Should life have dealt a different hand |
Stereotyping and Dehumanisation | 5-9 We need to see them for who they really are Chancers and scroungers Layabouts and loungers With bombs up their sleeves Cut-throats and thieves |
Exclusion and Rejection | 10-17 They are not Welcome here We should make them Go back to where they came from They cannot Share our food Share our homes Share our countries |
Isolation and Division | 18-25 Instead let us Build a wall to keep them out It is not okay to say These are people just like us A place should only belong to those who are born there Do not be so stupid to think that The world can be looked at another way |
Before students get too disillusioned with Bilston’s anti-immigration rhetoric and flock to his website or social media accounts to harangue him, ask them if they think this is really the poet’s view. Could this poem “be looked at another way”?
Hand out Refugees 2 and have students look at the additional line at the bottom of the page - (now read from bottom to top).
You could ask the class to read it out loud, with each student taking turns reading a line.
Next, move on to the next task, sectioning in reverse. This time, the line numbers have been given, but the students need to think of (or look up if they lack the precise vocabulary) suitable titles for each section. They could use antonyms of the words used in the first sectioning task or create short subheadings that capture the essence of the section.
Possible answers
Section (allow answers that express the same sentiment) | Line Numbers |
Hope and Shared Humanity | 18-25 |
Inclusion and Generosity | 10-17 |
Rejecting Stereotypes | 5-9 |
Empathy and Shared Circumstances | 1-4 |
The next step is to have students explore the meaning behind the poem and record their thoughts. For more proficient classes, you could just lead a discussion of these questions. For others, give them time to write down their ideas before sharing, first in pairs, then as a class. This is good scaffolding for responding to questions in depth during the Individual Oral parts 2 and 3.
Here are some ideas you might hear from students or aim to elicit if they are struggling to express their opinions.
1. How does the reversed structure affect the overall message of the poem?
- Creates two contrasting perspectives: exclusion vs. inclusion.
- Challenges readers to reconsider assumptions about refugees.
- Shows how perspective changes understanding of global issues like migration.
2. Why might people hold the beliefs presented in the forward reading? Why might others hold the beliefs we see when it’s read backwards?
- Forward reading beliefs:
- Influenced by fear, stereotypes, or misinformation.
- Perceived threat to resources or safety.
- Reverse reading beliefs:
- Empathy for shared humanity.
- Understanding of refugees' struggles and rights.
3. The poem ends with, "The world can be looked at another way." What are the two meanings of this line?
- Literal: The poem’s reversed reading changes its meaning.
- Figurative: We can change our perspective and see refugees with compassion instead of prejudice.
Going Further
This issue presents an opportunity for students to produce a written text in response. The prompt below could be used to encourage students to express their views and also recycle some of the language learned in this lesson.
Writing task
You are saddened by scenes on the news of far-right extremists promoting hatred towards refugees. You want to address this issue with your school community and offer a message of hope over hate. Write a text in which you outline the far-right group’s attitudes, explain why you disagree with them, and call on people to stand up to hatred.
Official Report / Speech / Article
Text Type Choices Unpacked
Speech
Most appropriate because it allows direct engagement with the school community, using persuasive language and emotional appeals to inspire action and promote hope. The audience is present, making it personal and impactful. The purpose aligns with motivating and uniting people against hate.
Article
Generally appropriate as it can inform a broader audience and provide detailed arguments against far-right attitudes. However, it lacks the immediacy and emotional connection of a speech, which may reduce its impact in fostering action within the school community.
Official Report
Generally inappropriate because its tone and structure are formal and factual, focusing on documenting information rather than persuading or inspiring. The audience for a report is typically officials or stakeholders, not a school community, and it does not suit the call for emotional engagement and activism.
Final thought...
It is hoped that, in line with the IB’s inclusive stance on refugees, and young people’s natural empathy for those less fortunate, your students will align with the views expressed in this lesson. However, it is important to acknowledge that some individuals may hold perspectives closer to those reflected in the initial reading of the poem. You might consider facilitating a balanced discussion of these opposing viewpoints, ensuring that the classroom remains a safe and respectful space. Be mindful to address any racist or xenophobic language or attitudes immediately, reinforcing that such views are not acceptable.