Recent posts View all
Home of real teaching & learning
  • Full support for teachers
  • Focus on critical thinking
  • Engaging classroom activities
  • Integrated student eBook
  • Assessed tasks / qBank
  • Practice exam questions

The InThinking Guarantee: Our sites are written by expert practitioners and not by AI

See our AI policy

Disclaimer: InThinking subject sites are neither endorsed by nor connected with the International Baccalaureate Organisation.

Don't miss out, find out!
IB Approved Workshops
Physics
IB DP Category 1

Paris, France, 13 - 15 November 2026

Find out more
Physics: A focus on the experimental programme
IB DP Category 3

Paris, France, 19 - 21 February 2027

Find out more
Physics
IB DP Category 2

Berlin, Germany, 26 - 28 February 2027

Find out more
Virtual Think-Ins

Find all InThinking events at
inthinking.net

Save time, abandon bad ideas

This morning my 6 labPro interfaces arrived from the states, now I need to buy some more sensors. The package was well wrapped with bubble wrap which gave me an idea about a way to demonstrate radioactive decay to blind students. When you squeeze bubble wrap the bubbles burst, is the rate at which they burst proportional to the number of remaining bubbles? One might think so. Much to the annoyance of my dog I experimented by recording the bubbles popping as I squeezed a piece of bubble wrap, the result is shown. Well the number of pops per second does seem to decrease with time however it's quite difficult to squeeze in a continuos way and there really aren't enough pops to analyse. My conclusion is that this is not a good way to model radioactive decay. Ben (my dog) can come back into the room now.

Help