Recent posts View all
Home of real teaching & learning
  • Full support for teachers
  • Focus on critical thinking
  • Engaging classroom activities
  • Integrated student eBook
  • Assessed tasks / qBank
  • Practice exam questions

The InThinking Guarantee: Our sites are written by expert practitioners and not by AI

See our AI policy

Disclaimer: InThinking subject sites are neither endorsed by nor connected with the International Baccalaureate Organisation.

Don't miss out, find out!
IB Approved Workshops
Physics
IB DP Category 1

Paris, France, 13 - 15 November 2026

Find out more
Physics: A focus on the experimental programme
IB DP Category 3

Paris, France, 19 - 21 February 2027

Find out more
Physics
IB DP Category 2

Berlin, Germany, 26 - 28 February 2027

Find out more
Virtual Think-Ins

Find all InThinking events at
inthinking.net

Invisible rods

Every week there is something interesting to be found in  Guardian Weekly science pages. This week there was a short piece on a planet with 4 suns. To quote from the article "It orbits one pair of stars and is in turn circled by a second pair". Reading this I thought they were saying that the planet is orbited by two stars but that can't be true since planets orbit stars not the other way round. What is happening is the two central stars are being orbited by two other stars with much bigger orbits than the planet. It's quite unlikely that such a combination would be formed. I tried making one in interactive physics with some success (minus the planet) as you can see. Actually I cheated, the central binary star is held together by an invisible rod, maybe I should suggest the invisible rod model as a possible solution.

National Geographic

Maybe I should also admit to my "outer suns" only having a mass of 10kg each.


Tags: astro

Help