Recent posts View all
Home of real teaching & learning
  • Full support for teachers
  • Focus on critical thinking
  • Engaging classroom activities
  • Integrated student eBook
  • Assessed tasks / qBank
  • Practice exam questions

The InThinking Guarantee: Our sites are written by expert practitioners and not by AI

See our AI policy

Disclaimer: InThinking subject sites are neither endorsed by nor connected with the International Baccalaureate Organisation.

Don't miss out, find out!
IB Approved Workshops
Physics
IB DP Category 1

Paris, France, 13 - 15 November 2026

Find out more
Physics: A focus on the experimental programme
IB DP Category 3

Paris, France, 19 - 21 February 2027

Find out more
Physics
IB DP Category 2

Berlin, Germany, 26 - 28 February 2027

Find out more
Virtual Think-Ins

Find all InThinking events at
inthinking.net

Three fiddy

Had an interesting TOK moment in class the other day. I was finishing off global warming with my HL class and showed them a graph on the SMARTboard that had copied from somewhere when preparing material for my book. The graph is quite a well known one showing the rise of CO2 concentration in ppm against date for the past 40 or so years. One of the students pointed out that it couldn't be correct because according to the graph we had already gone past the point of no return which is supposed to be 350. The class knew this fact was because we had a visit last year by Bill McKibben who started the 350 movement. Anyway I also remembered the number 350 and realised that something must be wrong with the graph.
NO.
Something was wrong with our understanding of 350. I looked it up after class and was reminded that 350 is the concentration we must get back to as soon as possible to avoid runaway climate change. Daunting.

350 (Three fiddy) is also a famous line from South Park but that's another story about the lochness monster.

Help