Home of real teaching & learning
  • Full support for teachers
  • Focus on critical thinking
  • Engaging classroom activities
  • Integrated student eBook
  • Assessed tasks / qBank
  • Practice exam questions

The InThinking Guarantee: Our sites are written by expert practitioners and not by AI

See our AI policy

Disclaimer: InThinking subject sites are neither endorsed by nor connected with the International Baccalaureate Organisation.

Don't miss out, find out!

Crit F: Future Development

The last criterion of the Artist Project, Criterion F: Future Development, offers a moment to build upon your learning and evaluation (Criterion E) and to harness your imagination to envision new directions and opportunities. This short-and-sweet criterion helps to bring the Artist Project experience full circle. 

What we'll cover on this page:

  • Criterion Overview
  • Real-world connections
  • Nuts & Bolts and Important Considerations
  • Starting Points
  • Essential Ingredients (Evidence & Requirements)

Criterion F: Overview of Future Development

GoalUse your evaluation to propose meaningful new directions and ideas in your creative practice.
Driving QuestionNow that you've evaluated your Artist Project, what new directions will you propose for your creative practice?
Weight4 marks (10% of the AP)
Highest Markband Descriptor"The proposal(s) to further develop the creative practice are meaningful and thoughtfully or imaginatively informed by the evaluation."

IB Visual Arts guide, p. 79

Empaquetage de Louis XIII – Monument. Collage by Christo, 1967. Pencil, polyethylene, twine, enamel paint, wax crayon, photostat, photograph, map, and tape.

Real-World Connections

Art-making is iterative

This means that every art-making experience feeds the next idea. When you look back at past work, you can pick out some of the most meaningful aspects to build into something new. Christo and Jeanne-Claude, a famous two-person duo, were constantly proposing and inventing new artistic ideas based on past work. “Empaquetage de Louis XIII  - Monument” was a proposal for a piece they never actually made, inspired by their earlier wrapped monuments in Rome and Paris in the 1960s.

 🥜 Nuts & Bolts 🔧 Important Considerations

What is a creative practice? Your creative practice includes the entire artistic process from developing ideas to experimentation to polishing and exhibiting your artwork. For Criterion F, explain how your experience with the Artist Project can inspire future creative processes or artworks.


Real or Imagined. Your future development proposal may result in a real artwork you plan to build or a visionary concept you can imagine making or developing.


Informed by the evaluation. Your proposal must directly connect to your evaluation in Criterion E. Pick a few key takeaways, such as the audience experience, communication of your idea or situating your AP artwork. Explain how your takeaways are thoughtfully shaping your ideas about future art work directions, ideas or processes.


Envision your idea visually. Use sketches, digital collages, source images, artist inspiration, or a combination to illustrate your proposal. Don't forget to cite external sources!


Proposal(s). You can propose more than one direction, idea, process, or artwork within this criterion.

Starting Points

Look at your creative practice as a whole. How can what you learned in the evaluation spark future creative opportunities?
Step 1, Brainstorm a Sky High, Visionary Proposal:

Your future proposal doesn't have to be realized. This is a chance for you to stretch your imagination based on your Artist Project evaluation. How you could push your creative practice? If time, money, or space were not a question, what could you imagine making or experimenting with?

Step 2, Brainstorm a Practical, Realistic Proposal:

Envision something you could make, given the resources you have available to you in your classroom studio and at home. Which takeaways from the Artist Project evaluation can help you to refine and deepen future Resolved Artworks or Inquiries in a practical way? Are there any new connections or concepts you'd like to continue developing in the future?

Step 3, Choose your Approach and Draft Your Proposal:

Based on your brainstorms, which approach feels the most meaningful and relevant to you? Develop your ideas and craft a short proposal in 200 words or less. Draw sketches or create digital illustrations to clearly communicate your vision and proposal.

Teacher only boxTeacher only box

Help your students select their approach

The following table helps to illustrate some of the pitfalls or opportunities of the different approaches for envisioning future work in Criterion F:

 AdvantagesVulnerabilities

Visionary proposal

  • ambitious
  • removes barriers
  • allows student to rethink their AP without the practical limitations that may have shaped the realization of their work
  • engages the imagination
  • easy to be unfocused or irrelevant
  • could be too grand to connect to the evaluation
  • potentially too abstract or broad

Practical proposal

  • concrete and direct
  • natural transition to go back to inquiring, experimenting, and making resolved artworks
  • authentic to real studio practice, mirroring how artists iterate and troubleshoot from one project to the next
  • students may get bogged down with technical fixes to their AP rather than pushing depth in their work
  • may set students on a path to create work that's very disconnected from their other resolved artworks
  • wanting to connect ideas to the coherence of resolved artworks may limit the scope of the imagination

Essential Ingredients

Requirements

  • maximum of 1 screen
  • up to 200 words
  • mixture of visual and written evidence

Evidence: 

  • digital collages or renderings
  • digitally manipulated images (i.e. a reworked image of the AP artwork)
  • hand drawn sketches or thumbnail drawings
  • source imagery (i.e. other artists' works, images of other sites or contexts, material inspiration)

Further Resources

 

Crit E: Post-Production Evaluation

Criterion E: Post-Production Evaluation asks you to look back upon the experience of realizing your Artist Project and critically evaluate the outcomes of situating your artwork in context and communicating...

 

The Artist Project HL

An externally assessed task weighted as 30%, The Artist Project (AP) asks HL students to envision an artwork that they can situate, create, and present with consideration of multiple (at least two)...

Image References:

Christo. Empaquetage de Louis XIII – Monument – (Projet pour Festival de Marais – Juin 1967). 1967. Christo and Jeanne-Claude Foundation, https://christojeanneclaude.net/artworks/wrapped-monuments-not-realized/. Photo: Archive. Accessed 17 Sept. 2026.

“Wrapped Monuments – Not Realized.” Christo and Jeanne-Claude Foundation, https://christojeanneclaude.net/artworks/wrapped-monuments-not-realized/. Accessed 17 Sept. 2026.

All materials on this website are for the exclusive use of teachers and students at subscribing schools for the period of their subscription. Any unauthorised copying or posting of materials on other websites is an infringement of our copyright and could result in your account being blocked and legal action being taken against you.

Help