July Blog: The Olympic Games - historical controversies

Tuesday 23 July 2024

 

Key moments in Olympic history

This Friday sees the opening ceremony of the 2024 Paris Olympics.

As well as being the focus of remarkable sporting achievements, the Olympic Games have often provided a spotlight on key historical issues and controversies. This seems a good time to review these episodes which could be the focus of an interesting history display in your classes or for an assembly. Students could also investigate any of these events further as the basis of an IA or EE.

The most notorious of these political controversies include:

1920 post war 'farce'

After a break of 8 years, Belgium went ahead in hosting the post war Olympics in difficult circumstances - lack of money, war weariness and fears of further encouraging the Spanish flu epidemic. Although promoted as a celebration of peace  (the interlocking rings were introduced for the first time to represent the interlocking of the five continents), in fact none of the recently defeated Central powers were invited. The  UK assistant under-secretary for foreign affairs, Eyre Crowe, decried the Olympics as 'an international farce' and joined a chorus of government officials arguing against funding a British Olympic team.

This article from The Conversation explains more about these Olympics including the impact of low funding - one sardine for breakfast, no mattresses and inadequate sporting facilities...

Note that Germany was also not invited to the 1924 Olympics and Germany and Japan were not invited to the 1948 Olympics.

Nazi propaganda in Berlin, 1936

Nazi Germany used the 1936 Olympic Games for propaganda purposes. The Nazis promoted an image of a new, strong, and united Germany while masking the regime’s targeting of Jews and Roma as well as Germany’s growing militarism. However Hitler's message of Aryan racial superiority was undermined by Black American Jesse Owen's stunning victories for which he secured four gold medals.

This section from the Holocaust Memorial Museum gives a full overview of Nazi policies before and after the games as well the international reaction. It also includes videos from the time:

Tensions and boycotts in 1956

The 1956 Summer Olympics in Melbourne were marked by intense political tension following the Soviet Union's invasion of Hungary. Several countries boycotted the event after the International Olympic Committee allowed Soviet athletes to participate. This tension culminated in a violent water polo match between the Soviet and Hungarian teams, known as the 'Blood in the Water' match, adding another controversial chapter to Olympic history.

Children of Glory is an excellent movie to show for covering the Hungarian Uprising as well the infamous polo match.

China also boycotted the Melbourne games because the IOC had decided to include Taiwan.

The 1968 Mexico Games; a massacre and civil rights protest

The 1968 Olympics in Mexico City were marked by student protests against the authoritarian government. These students used the media attention leading up to the Olympics to voice their dissent. However, the government responded with military force, resulting in deaths of students in what was known as the  Tlatelolco Massacre. Fifty years later, the death toll from the massacre is still unknown, though at the time student leaders estimated 190 protesters had died (the government claimed it was only 26). Historians say the massacre stemmed from the government’s fear that the student protests would disrupt the upcoming Olympic Games.

Once the games started, there was another political drama when Black American sprinters Tommie Smith and John Carlos climbed the podium shoeless to receive their medals, wearing only black socks to symbolize Black poverty, and raised black-gloved fists into the air. The Black Power salute raised on the Olympic podium was a powerful moment of protest seen around the world, and a demonstration of solidarity with the U.S. civil rights movement. Both men were then removed from the US Olympic team.

Tragedy at the 1972 Olympic Games

Palestinian militants took 11 members of the Israeli delegation hostage inside the Olympic village in Munich, Germany, on September 5, 1972. The terrorists, who claimed to be part of the Black September movement, were demanding the liberation of Palestinian prisoners held in Israel. After killing two hostages, they negotiated for a plane to take them out of the country. But a German police operation to rescue the Israelis went horribly wrong. In the end, all the hostages were killed, along with five of the eight attackers and a German police officer.

Inside the Olympic stadium, the equestrian dressage was taking place as planned even as the drama unfolded. And Television satellite technology allowed an estimated one billion people around the world to watch as tragedy unfolded.

The Academy award winning documentary One Day in September is excellent for showing the horrors of this event and the failures of the rescue effort.

1976, 1980 and 1984: Boycotts

Boycotts have been a feature of many of the games. In 1976 more than twenty African countries staged a last-minute boycott of the Montreal Olympics after the IOC allowed New Zealand to compete. The nations had called for the IOC to ban New Zealand after its rugby team played in racially segregated South Africa.

Following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and during the 'Second Cold War' the two superpowers were the focus of the boycotts. Sixty nations joined the US' call to boycott the 1980 games in Moscow. The Soviet Union then retaliated in 1984 when the summer games were held in Los Angeles; most of the Warsaw Pact countries refused to compete.

There is definitely more on this theme! See this CFR site for a timeline of Olympic political controversies:

Site update

We are continuing to develop our site to enable you and your students to find what you need faster, and to further enrich the range of activities and content.

Our latest update is for Paper 2, Topic 11, Second World War:

Curriculum Review

A reminder that the 3rd Curriculum Review can be found on MyIB.

This gives an overview of the format for the new history curriculum -  the skills focus and assessment structure for each paper. The Review also contains the crucial information that the final guide will be published in February 2026 with first teaching from August of that year, and first exams in May 2028.

We will keep you updated with any more information on the review and we aim to have our site ready with new materials and guidance for your teaching of the new course by August 2026.

New books and documentaries

This month sees the publication of a new book on Cuba by Naom Chomsky, On Cuba: Reflections on 70 Years of Revolution and Struggle:

'Through an intimate conversation between two of the country’s most astute observers of international politics, Noam Chomsky and Vijay Prashad, On Cuba traces Cuban history from the early days of the 1950s revolution to the present, interrogating U.S. interventions and extracting lessons on U.S. power and influence in the Western Hemisphere along the way.'

Also recently published, 'an eccentric but provocative retelling of the modern history of the Arab world' : We are your soldiers: how Abdul Gammer Nasser remade the Arab World' by Alex Rowell.

See below for a review from Foreign Affairs on this book.

We Are Your Soldiers: How Gamal Abdel Nasser Remade the Arab World (Foreign Affairs)

In this retelling of the Arab world’s modern history, Rowell weaves an entertaining story of how Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser helped reshape the political landscape of the Middle East.

Published in June, a new book on the Cold War by Sergey Radchenko - To Run the World: The Kremlin’s Cold War Bid for Global Power - has, says John Lewis Gaddis in this review in Foreign Affairs the potential to significantly revise not only how historians think about the Soviet Union but also the much longer sweep of Russian history that has now unexpectedly produced, in Putin, a new tsar.'

Finally, there is a new series on Netflix on Hitler, Hitler and the Nazis: Evil on Trial  ' a mixture of re-enactments, talking heads and a narrative that stretches from the end of the first world war to the Nuremberg trials'