Dear Angus Not in the old curriculum. It will be possible to see it on the new Paper 3.
Natural experiment: Smoking bansAs it would be an ERQ, they would earn 0 marks for criterion C but could still earn marks for the other criteria, as long as it is focused on the question.
Exemplar: CommunicationHi John, If students used Lueck and Wilson for a question about ethical considerations should they talk about confidentiality instead of anonymity? I assume that the interviewers knew who the participants were but names were kept confidential.Or...
Lueck and Wilson (2010)Followup -Q: When grading, do they get ANY points for Knowledge & Understanding (B) or Research (C), or is it simply 0 marks because not appropriate study?
Exemplar: CommunicationOk, thanks John, that makes complete sense. It's so interesting how some of my students try to make a study fit a prompt. Appreciate your clarification! Naomi
Exemplar: CommunicationHi John My students were wonderinh whether stratified sampling could arise in a real paper 3 stem because it doesn't appear in the IB guide for psych - in the list of sampling methods, stratified isn't mentioned. Does this mean is it is unlikley...
Natural experiment: Smoking bansDear Alin All sources are listed in the textbook references. Here is the reference: Brown GW, Harris TO (1978). Social Origins of Depression: A Study of Psychiatric Disorder in Women. L London: Tavistock Publications. The problem...
Brown & Harris (1978)Thank you! Such a relief!
Study guide: Cognition and techDear Iaa No, It is not an example of framing effect as there is no loss aversion demonstrated.
Framing effect lab
John
Site authorDear Jill, I agree with you that there is a difference between the two terms. However, the IB does not penalize students for using the terms interchangeably.
Lueck and Wilson (2010)