Estimada Cristina, es posible. Deben elegir un trastorno específico; de lo contrario, la pregunta no está bien enfocada. Y deben tener mucho cuidado de no incluir detalles sobre abuso sexual. Este es un tema muy delicado y muchos examinadores...
Choosing a questionDear Hernando I am a workshop leader, and this was from the Assessment team. Many felt that the specimen question, although technically legal, was unfair because the guide does not specify that students need to learn "strategies to measure TOM."...
Essay type: MeasurementDear Pete Yes, that is correct. In the case of disorders (one of the only other ways TWE can be asked), then it would be easiest for students to use a study from a different approach. So, if they are discussing a cognitive approach,...
Writing ERQsHi John, Could you provide me with some clarification on the prompt: "Discuss a cognitive approach to one etiology of abnormal behaviour." Can this be interpreted simply as: "Discuss a cognitive explanation for one...
ERQ marking: Cognitive etiologiesHi John In the 5th Question above on Marianne is British example is based on Social comparison, however I don't see explanation on Social comparison on this page?
Social Identity TheoryAnd, similarly, when discussing communication, would the Bowlby study count (if they say women want rich men to provide for them/offspring)?
Exemplar: CommunicationDear Andrew I don't see where it says that they must do that. It is one of the strategies that is suggested above. I think that it is often much easier for students to evaluate their materials than it is to evaluate their procedure...
Writing the EvaluationDear Lucija Yes, that is fine for the old curriculum as well.
Lowe et al (2004)Hi John & Laura: A student used Hazan & Shaver "love quiz" study to discuss communication and relationships. Will that count as a research study if student says communication in relationships is influenced by the people's attachment styles...
Exemplar: Communication
John
Site authorDear Naomi No, that would not earn credit. It is not the aim or the findings of the study.
Exemplar: Communication