for your convenience, this is the marscheme offered, but I find it very confusing...: Explanations include but are not limited to: • Mathematical models of cognition • Computer models of cognition • Models are tested...
Paper 1: Section BDear Emma That is exactly the focus of the new curriculum.
Paper 1: Section BDear John, In the sample paper there is a question: A group of researchers investigated imagination as a cognitive process. They suggested a model in which imagination consists of three stages of processing: •- Selection of elements •-...
Paper 1: Section BHi John, if I'm not mistaken, Bandura placed the children based on the teachers' aggression ratings (?) Therefore is this a quasi experiment or still considered as true experiment?
Bandura (1961)thank you,
Writing samples: DevelopmentHi John, For the question , Evaluate one or more theories of brain development in development as a learner. My thoughts are only biological on maturation theory.
Writing samples: DevelopmentThank you, John.
Setting up your survey/questionnaireThank you so much, John! I panicked a little because this is what I have been asking my students to do since the beginning of the year. For a moment, I wondered whether I had been grading them too harshly. With this new curriculum, I feel like I need...
P1A: Genetic inheritance (Depression)Okay. I wasn't sure if it would invalidate a large amount of the overall paper or just that section. That's roughly what I had done. I made a comment about it in the introduction, but took off the points in the analysis. Thanks for the prompt...
IA clarifications
John
Site authorIt is a matched pairs design - so it is still a true experiment. They were rated by their teachers but then randomly allocated to conditions. The matching of children by aggression level actually increases the internal validity as it serves...
Bandura (1961)