I agree with that! Thanks for the insight.
E1 MCQs: Nuclear Structure (HL)Hey Danny, I think replacing the current Q6-8 in Atomic models with those three makes the most sense! That way Atomic models matches the first two bullet points of E.1. Then revisiting nuclear notation in E.3 in the context of isotopes...
E1 MCQs: Nuclear Structure (HL)Hi Danny, For the sequencing of my own teaching, that is definitely an example of how I would think (as in, inserting certain topics from other parts (parts meaning A.1, D.2, E.3 etc) of the syllabus as needed or for synergy reasons). But for...
E1 MCQs: Atomic modelsHey Benson, Agreed, I should mark this as an HL-only quiz. I included those first 3 questions here because I think the HL students need to know about neutrons in E.1, and so nuclear notation makes sense for them here. However, for SL students,...
E1 MCQs: Nuclear Structure (HL)Hey Benson, Those questions were designed to go with the Thomson experiment, which isn't explicitly in this unit. I think the idea is that we need to understand the electron as a small, negative particle in order to start thinking about atomic...
E1 MCQs: Atomic modelsHi Team, This quiz is a welcome addition, but perhaps you could move the first 3 questions back into Atomic models, so that this quiz can be focused on HL topics only? Thanks, Benson
E1 MCQs: Nuclear Structure (HL)Hi Team, What was the rationale for putting the D.3 questions (Q6-8) in this quiz? Cheers, Benson
E1 MCQs: Atomic modelsYou are right. I added some clarification to questions 4-6 about directions.
Mini Year 1 exam - for practiceQ6 is Ambiguous and needs clarification about the sign of acceleration or direction information.
Mini Year 1 exam - for practice
Danny
Site authorHL Paper 2, question 4c, I get 1.47 instead of 1.42. It looks like the solution uses 60 g instead of 65 g.
Mock examinations - mark scheme